don't quite agree with bad judgments about gerhard richter motive choices, i see him as a tireless seeker for technics and themes, and maybe this can not put all his work beautifully in tune in an exhibition, but why would i define one style or something to be stuck on? just to be consisted on the viewers mind, being easy recognizable? his retrospective exhibition on tate might have not made sense for the ones who likes sorted ends. but this is so much more tangible, being able to rebuilt yourself how many times you feel like. coherency is for mathematicians
his series about the baader-meinhof group
No comments:
Post a Comment